Casino Korea

Gambling and North Korea: Casinos, Sanctions, and the Two Koreas' Contrasting Approaches

The Korean Peninsula presents one of the world's most striking contrasts in gambling policy. While South Korea maintains strict prohibitions on citizen gambling with notable exceptions, North Korea operates state-run casinos designed to extract foreign currency from visitors while simultaneously condemning gambling as a decadent capitalist vice forbidden to its own citizens. This paradox reflects the broader contradictions of the North Korean system and offers a unique lens through which to understand gambling policy on the divided peninsula.

Understanding North Korean gambling operations requires examining the regime's desperate need for foreign currency, the role of sanctions in shaping casino operations, and the ideological framework that allows the state to profit from activities it officially denounces. This analysis also illuminates how the two Koreas, despite sharing cultural heritage and historical attitudes toward gambling, have developed radically different approaches shaped by their divergent political systems.

Research Limitations

Information about North Korea is inherently limited due to the regime's secrecy. This article relies on defector testimony, reports from international organizations, academic research, and rare journalistic accounts. The current operational status of North Korean casinos remains uncertain due to COVID-19 border closures that began in 2020 and international sanctions.

North Korean Casino Operations

North Korea operates several gambling facilities, primarily targeting Chinese tourists and foreign businesspeople. These casinos serve as foreign currency generators for a regime under severe international economic pressure.

The Pyongyang Casino

The most well-known North Korean gambling facility operates within the Yanggakdo International Hotel in Pyongyang. This 47-story hotel, located on an island in the Taedong River, caters to foreign tourists and includes a casino among its amenities.

The casino's design and operations reportedly mirror those found in Macau and other Asian gambling destinations, though on a smaller scale. According to reports documented by the Council on Foreign Relations, such tourism facilities have historically been important sources of hard currency for the regime.

Rason Special Economic Zone

The Rason Special Economic Zone, located in North Korea's northeastern corner near the Chinese and Russian borders, has hosted gambling facilities targeting cross-border visitors. This area operates under different economic rules than the rest of North Korea, allowing more market-oriented activities.

Casino operations in Rason have reportedly included:

The proximity to China makes Rason particularly attractive for gambling tourism, as Chinese visitors can cross the border relatively easily compared to reaching Pyongyang. However, UN sanctions and Chinese government restrictions on North Korea-related tourism have significantly impacted these operations.

Other Gambling Facilities

Additional gambling operations have been reported at:

Foreign Currency and Sanctions

North Korean casino operations must be understood within the context of the regime's chronic foreign currency shortage and international sanctions designed to limit its hard currency earnings.

The Hard Currency Imperative

North Korea faces severe hard currency constraints due to:

Casinos represent one of the few remaining channels for the regime to earn foreign currency directly from visitors. According to research published by the RAND Corporation, such revenue streams become increasingly important as other sources are constrained by sanctions.

UN Sanctions Impact

Multiple UN Security Council resolutions have imposed sanctions on North Korea following nuclear and missile tests. These sanctions affect casino operations in several ways:

The UN Security Council's 1718 Sanctions Committee maintains the comprehensive sanctions regime against North Korea, which has been progressively strengthened following each nuclear or missile test.

Chinese Tourism and Enforcement

Chinese tourists represent the primary customer base for North Korean casinos. However, Chinese government enforcement of UN sanctions and its own policies has varied over time:

The uncertain future of Chinese tourism to North Korea raises questions about whether casino operations can resume at previous levels once borders reopen.

Ideological Contradictions

North Korea's operation of casinos presents significant ideological contradictions with its official Juche ideology and condemnation of capitalist vices.

Official Position on Gambling

North Korean state ideology officially condemns gambling as:

This condemnation mirrors historical communist attitudes toward gambling, which was banned in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, and other socialist states as antithetical to socialist values.

Pragmatic Exception for Foreigners

The regime reconciles this contradiction through several rhetorical strategies:

This approach parallels North Korea's operation of duty-free shops selling Western luxury goods, special economic zones with market activities, and other ventures that contradict official ideology but serve regime interests.

Punishment for Citizens

North Korean citizens caught gambling face severe consequences under the regime's strict social control policies:

This stands in stark contrast to South Korean enforcement, where gambling violations result in fines and potential imprisonment but within a rule-of-law framework with legal protections.

Comparing the Two Koreas

The divided Korean Peninsula offers a unique opportunity to compare gambling policies shaped by the same cultural heritage but radically different political systems.

Shared Heritage, Different Paths

Prior to 1945, the Korean Peninsula had a unified approach to gambling influenced by Confucian values and Japanese colonial regulations. The post-division period saw each Korea develop distinct gambling policies reflecting their ideological orientations, though both ultimately restrict citizen gambling. This comparison illuminates how political systems shape gambling regulation beyond cultural factors.

Structural Similarities

Despite their differences, both Koreas share several gambling policy features:

Fundamental Differences

The differences, however, are profound:

Aspect South Korea North Korea
Legal Framework Comprehensive legislation with regulatory bodies State decree without transparent legal framework
Citizen Exception Kangwon Land allows citizen gambling Absolute prohibition for citizens
Legal Lottery Legal state lottery and sports betting No known legal gambling for citizens
Treatment Services Extensive treatment infrastructure No known treatment programs
Transparency Public reporting of revenues, statistics Complete opacity; no public information
Penalties Fines and imprisonment with legal process Labor camps without legal protections
International Integration Participates in international gaming associations Isolated; operates under sanctions

Policy Motivations

The motivations behind each Korea's gambling restrictions differ significantly:

South Korea's motivations (as explored in our analysis of religious perspectives):

North Korea's motivations:

North Korean Defectors and Gambling

An understudied aspect of Korean gambling involves North Korean defectors who resettle in South Korea. These individuals face unique challenges related to gambling and money management.

Vulnerability Factors

North Korean defectors may be particularly vulnerable to gambling problems due to:

Documented Cases

Research and media reports have documented cases of defectors losing resettlement funds to gambling, though comprehensive statistics are limited. The South Korean government's Hana Foundation, which supports defector resettlement, has reportedly incorporated financial literacy education to address this vulnerability.

This issue connects to broader research on vulnerable populations and gambling, similar to studies on youth gambling and elderly gambling in South Korea.

Cross-Border Gambling Issues

The divided peninsula creates unique cross-border gambling dynamics that differ from typical international gambling contexts.

Historical Inter-Korean Tourism

Before the 2008 suspension, South Korean tourists could visit the Mount Kumgang resort in North Korea. While primarily focused on nature tourism, the broader inter-Korean tourism raised questions about potential gambling exposure:

Kaesong Industrial Complex

The now-suspended Kaesong Industrial Complex, where South Korean companies operated with North Korean workers, represented another unique cross-border situation. No gambling facilities operated there, but the complex illustrated the challenges of economic engagement across the divide.

Hypothetical Reunification Scenarios

Academic discussions of Korean reunification occasionally address how gambling policy might be harmonized:

While reunification remains distant, the future of gambling regulation on the peninsula will inevitably be shaped by inter-Korean relations.

International Implications

North Korean gambling operations have broader implications for international sanctions, money laundering, and regional gambling markets.

Sanctions Enforcement

North Korean casinos present challenges for sanctions enforcement:

International bodies including the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) have identified North Korea as a high-risk jurisdiction for money laundering and terrorist financing, with casino operations potentially contributing to these concerns.

Regional Competition

North Korean casinos, when operational, compete with regional gambling destinations for Chinese tourists:

The unique "forbidden zone" appeal of North Korea may attract some visitors who could otherwise gamble in more accessible locations.

Money Laundering Concerns

North Korean casinos raise money laundering concerns due to:

The Future of North Korean Gambling

Several factors will shape the future of gambling in North Korea:

Sanctions Trajectory

The future of North Korean casinos depends heavily on sanctions:

Post-COVID Recovery

North Korea's extreme COVID-19 border closure (among the world's strictest) has effectively suspended all tourism since early 2020. Recovery will depend on:

Regime Priorities

The Kim Jong-un regime's priorities will shape gambling development:

Lessons for Understanding Korean Gambling

The North Korean case illuminates several broader points about gambling policy on the Korean Peninsula:

Cultural vs. Political Factors

The two Koreas demonstrate that political systems shape gambling policy as much as shared cultural heritage. Despite common Confucian traditions and historical attitudes, the two countries have developed distinct approaches reflecting their political ideologies. This challenges simplistic cultural explanations for gambling restrictions.

The Foreigner Exception

Both Koreas maintain "foreigner casinos" that allow foreigners to gamble while prohibiting citizens. This suggests a common view that gambling's primary harm falls on the domestic population, while extracting money from foreigners is acceptable or even desirable. This approach may reflect shared cultural attitudes despite political divergence.

State Control of Gambling

Both Koreas maintain strict state control over gambling rather than allowing private enterprise. In South Korea, this manifests as government-owned casinos and regulated monopolies. In North Korea, it means direct state operation. This shared preference for state control may reflect cultural attitudes about gambling as a potentially dangerous activity requiring government oversight.

Information Limitations

The North Korean case highlights how difficult it is to study gambling in closed societies. While South Korea produces extensive gambling statistics and research, North Korea offers almost no verifiable data. This asymmetry should caution researchers about the limits of comparative analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does North Korea have casinos?

Yes, North Korea operates several casino facilities, though their current operational status is uncertain due to international sanctions and COVID-19 restrictions. The most notable facility is the Pyongyang Casino in the Yanggakdo International Hotel, which caters exclusively to foreign visitors. The regime has also operated casinos in the Rason Special Economic Zone near the Chinese and Russian borders to attract foreign currency.

Can North Korean citizens gamble?

No. Like South Korea, North Korea prohibits its own citizens from gambling. North Korean casinos are strictly reserved for foreign visitors, primarily Chinese tourists and businesspeople. Any North Korean citizen caught gambling could face severe punishment under the regime's strict social control policies, potentially including detention in labor camps.

How do UN sanctions affect North Korean casinos?

UN Security Council sanctions imposed on North Korea following nuclear and missile tests have significantly impacted casino operations. Sanctions restrict North Korea's ability to earn foreign currency, and financial restrictions make it difficult for international visitors to transfer money for gambling purposes. The luxury tourism sector, including casinos, has been specifically targeted by some sanctions measures designed to limit the regime's hard currency earnings.

What is the main difference between North and South Korean gambling policies?

Both Koreas prohibit their citizens from gambling, but their motivations differ significantly. South Korea's restrictions stem from public health concerns, Confucian cultural values, and addiction prevention. North Korea's gambling prohibition is rooted in ideological opposition to "capitalist vices" while paradoxically operating casinos to extract foreign currency from visitors. South Korea has extensive treatment infrastructure for problem gambling; North Korea has no publicly known treatment programs.

Conclusion

Gambling on the Korean Peninsula represents a unique case study in how political systems shape policy responses to a common social phenomenon. Both Koreas share cultural attitudes that view gambling with suspicion, but they have translated these attitudes into radically different regulatory frameworks reflecting their political orientations.

North Korea's operation of casinos for foreigners while condemning gambling as a capitalist vice illustrates the regime's pragmatic approach to ideology when hard currency is at stake. The impact of international sanctions on these operations demonstrates how gambling policy intersects with broader geopolitical concerns.

For researchers and observers of Korean gambling policy, the North Korean case offers both a comparative perspective on South Korean regulations and a cautionary example of gambling in an authoritarian context without transparency, treatment resources, or legal protections for those who develop problems.

As the situation on the Korean Peninsula evolves, gambling policy will likely remain a minor but illuminating aspect of the broader relationship between the two Koreas and their place in the international community.

Educational Purpose

This article provides information for educational and research purposes about gambling policies across the Korean Peninsula. It does not encourage travel to North Korea, which may be illegal for citizens of some countries and carries significant risks. Most forms of gambling are illegal for Korean citizens under South Korean law. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, please see our responsible gambling resources.

Related Resources